Home / NEWS LENS / SAA: League of Maritime Editors Condemns Attack On NPA MD At N’Assembly, Tasks Senate  

SAA: League of Maritime Editors Condemns Attack On NPA MD At N’Assembly, Tasks Senate  

SAA: League of Maritime Editors Condemns Attack On NPA MD At N’Assembly, Tasks Senate   

L-R: The Managing Djrector, Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) Ms. Hadiza Bala-Usman and Captain Hosa Osunbo, Chairman of Ocean Marine Solutions Limited (OMSL), exchanging pleasantries at the floor of the Senate during the investigation, last week.

The League of Maritime Editors and Publishers (LMEP) has condemned the attack on the Managing Director of the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), Ms Hadiza Bala Usman,  at the National Assembly by hoodlums suspected  to be protesting against the recent  decision of the authority to dismantle  the  Secure Anchorage Area (SAA) contract  arrangement.


Usman had gone to the Senate  on invitation to participate in the Investigative Hearing on the activities of Wells Ogunboh of Messrs Ocean Maritime Solutions Limited (OMSL) and other security agencies at the Safe Anchorage area in Lagos.


She had in a petition to the National Assembly said that she was ambushed at the exit door of the Senate and threatened after attending the  investigative hearing.  


In a press statement signed by the President, Mr Kingsley Anaroke and Secretary General, Mr Francis Ugwoke, the Association said such attack inside in the National Assembly was shocking and should not be swept under the carpet.


Describing the incident as a national disgrace, the association called the Senate leadership to investigate those behind the attack and bring them to book, adding that  it was the duty of the lawmakers to provide security for   chief executives or other highly placed Nigerians visiting the Chamber for public hearing.


According to the association, except the Senate rises up against such attack in future, it will be an excuse for some Nigerians and indeed chief executives to shun invitations to the Upper chamber during public hearings.


“First, we wish to condemn the attack on Madam Usman. It is wicked. It tells Nigerians how bad the nation is degenerating. How can such a thing happen  on the floor of the National Assembly, few steps away from where public hearing is holding. The Senate needs to rise and investigate this matter because of the obvious implications”, the statement said.


The association also argued the position of the NPA management led by Usman on dismantling the SAA was for the sake of  national  interest and economy.


The statement explained that this was considering the huge amount being charged vessels  using the anchorage area  which has a lot of implications.


Besides, the association pointed out that the duty of protecting vessels calling at the nation’s waters was the statutory responsibility of the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA).


NIMASA on the other hand,  the association said,    has also over the years engaged the Nigerian Navy with equipment and huge   resources to carry out this assignment.


At a time when the federal government is preaching the need to reduce the cost of doing business at the nation’s ports, the association said this was simply a contradiction in practical terms of what government preaches at the ports.


The association further explained that this was moreso since shipowers or  their multinational  representative agents  would in turn introduce other charges to  recover what is spent on  SAA for security of their vessels.


The association observed as  worrisome   NPA’s revelation that its vessels were among those being used to  provide security for vessels on the anchorage.


The statement added, “With revelations on how much is collected on daily basis, monthly and annually, it is alarming how much is going to one company’s account for  a job  which should be the  statutory responsibility of NIMASA and Navy.


“Unknown to many Nigerians, whatever is being billed shipowners using the anchorage  is also collected from  Nigerians through high shipping charges which in turn will  have negative effect on prices of goods in the market. At a time Nigeria is on a campaign for easy of doing business at the ports, the SAA is a glaring contradiction.


“We all know that NIMASA is spending heavily on anti-piracy and robbery at sea, including its efforts in the fight against the menace in the Gulf of Guinea. It is  relying  on the Navy for this.  The agency needs to assume the full responsibility of what SAA is all about for which Nigerians are being ripped off and have become  victims in terms of surcharges by shipowners who  with the SAA arrangement  can readily defend  such illegal charges. For us in the League as fourth estate of the realm, the party should be over now and we fully support the NPA on this matter. SAA arrangement should give way for NIMASA and Navy to do their statutory beat”.


The association is aware from reports that vessels are charged $2,500 for the first day and $1,500 for other days for using the anchorage.


The duty of the company is to provide security for the vessels for the period that they will remain in the area.


With each vessel spending as long as 28-30 days  before exiting the anchorage, it is huge revenue for the private company.


For instance, reports from NPA showed that  of the 1,666 vessels which visited the Lagos ports alone for the first quarter of this year, a minimum of 55 percent used the anchorage.


The company which started operations in 2014, according to news report  is believed to be netting  an average of about , $133.28 million (N47.98 billion) yearly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


× Get News Alert